Separatism is dead. Sovereignty is dying. Iâ€™m concerned about the latter; the former is still pointless.
These terms have unfortunately come to be somewhat interchangeable in Canadian political discourse, particularly when it comes to the perennial â€˜QuÃ©bec Questionâ€™, though in my eye â€“ and in political/philosophical terms â€“ they are exceptionally different. I would like to devote the rest of life to ensuring each individual citizen comprehends the fundamental importance of the latter, and further ensuring that each individual living in our collective society understands the suicidal lunacy of the former. We are a particular nation â€“ the sovereign collective, the collectively sovereign â€“ and it seems to me that our lack of self-awareness, our seeming lack of a socio-cultural foundation lie somewhere deep in this political reality. We shirk from our responsibility to understand ourselves more fully, feeling ourselves to be presently and perhaps forevermore, a mere accident; Europeâ€™s wasted effort.
Canada is not a nation. We are a collective of nations. We have no Nationalism â€“ and why would we? Destroying the greatest evil Nationalism ever created propelled us from Imperial Backwater to World Power in six years. Nationalism was the 19th centuryâ€™s mistake, and we were justified in turning our backs on it. We did this years ago. We made ourselves post-national and post-modern back in the 1960s. The good work done then lasted us well into the first part of the last decade; no matter Stephen Harper tells you or makes you think, the Canada you live in is an inherently progressive country. Our laws, enshrined in our Constitution and Charter, make us a leading liberal social-democratic nation. And it was no accident.
Iâ€™m not going to whitewash things. Weâ€™re not perfect. But we have relatable foundation documents. We have modern foundation documents. No â€œTea Party Northâ€ will re-interpret our Charter â€“ itâ€™s meaning and intent is clear, and it, like our Constitution and the thirty yearsâ€™ worth of legal proceedings since its repatriation, remain clear, progressive, inherently liberal. Despite some stand-out historical abuses of power which have marred our countryâ€™s reputation, we have managed to create a unique and exceptionally powerful example of a liberal democracy with a social-justice bent.
But we canâ€™t take it for granted.
The Orange Crush of May 2nd 2011 demonstrated a sea-change in Canadian and QuÃ©bec politics. QuÃ©bec decided with one vote to forego the continued widespread support of a regionalist-bloc party and instead threw their support behind the dedicated agent of social-democratic change in Canadian federal politics. In essence, the people of QuÃ©bec indicated that they are prepared to work with all Canadians to ensure Canada does not deviate too far towards neo-Conservatism. This event has heralded the end of sectarian/regionalist federalist parties: no longer can the CPC play the old Tory Populist card of appealing to Conservative rural voters in QuÃ©bec and the West. The CPC is an alliance of regionalist, non-integrationalist thoughts and perspectives, manifested as a political entity. It is a party of division that succeeded by re-enforcing division. And yet from this we find unison, and surely the Tories could never have expected almost all of QuÃ©bec to decide, almost overnight, to throw their support behind the NDP. Neither could they have imagined NDP support would grow â€“ nationally â€“ to the point where Jack Layton would retire his two main rivals. He is the undisputed leader of the national opposition, and his powerbase is primarily in QuÃ©bec, though curiously all of the major cities as well. The May 2nd election was an event of national importance: there are indeed ties that bind and unite this nation. The cities are pan-nationalistic. QuÃ©bec is the minoritÃ©-majeur. The NDP is the future of Canada and the sovereignty of all Canadians is the only major national concern moving forward.
Separatism must die â€“ and it seems that this is the case. The Bloc is a shell of its former self, and pÃ©quiste stalwarts are dropping like flies. Itâ€™s no longer in vogue for the young and itâ€™s losing whatever academic or economic credibility it once pretended to have. And at the end of the day it is not about whether or not itâ€™s just for the people of QuÃ©bec to have their own stolen piece of Aboriginal land, their own coins or trade agreements. Itâ€™s about what each of us owe to the other in the land we share. Itâ€™s about biting the bullet and getting involved, paying your taxes and working hard to support the welfare-state that keeps us safe and secure. Itâ€™s also about recognizing where these ideas come from, what their genesis was, and why we live the lives we do.
Canada wouldnâ€™t exist without QuÃ©bec; neither in our past nor our future. And in this relationship, where QuÃ©bec sits as a kind of first-amongst-equals with regards to the other provinces, QuÃ©bec has serious responsibilities â€“ to lead, to mediate, to demonstrate the ancient wisdom of our people, to demonstrate our intractable nature and commitment for the betterment of all Canadians. A separatist is fundamentally a nationalist-capitalist, disinclined to share. A sovereignist by contrast seeks to establish a confederation where sharing is the law, and we all take a little to maximize our collective freedoms.
And as we hit the mid-point of 2011, with news-reports coming in at an increasing rate of police abuses and contested civil rights from all corners of the decadent West, we must ask ourselves just how separate we really want to be. Because, when the state turns fascistic â€“ even if only by a small degree â€“ it is the collective sovereignty of the people that is fundamentally threatened. And the response can never hope of succeeding if it is divided.
This article was originally posted to Forget the Box.